Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment | 拾書所

Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment

$ 350 元 原價 350

Imagine that two doctors in the same city give different diagnoses to identical patients—or that two judges in the same courthouse give markedly different sentences to people who have committed the same crime. Suppose that different interviewers at the same firm make different decisions about indistinguishable job applicants—or that when a company is handling customer complaints, the resolution depends on who happens to answer the phone. Now imagine that the same doctor, the same judge, the same interviewer, or the same customer service agent makes different decisions depending on whether it is morning or afternoon, or Monday rather than Wednesday. These are examples of noise: variability in judgments that should be identical.

In Noise, Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony, and Cass R. Sunstein show the detrimental effects of noise in many fields, including medicine, law, economic forecasting, forensic science, bail, child protection, strategy, performance reviews, and personnel selection. Wherever there is judgment, there is noise. Yet, most of the time, individuals and organizations alike are unaware of it. They neglect noise. With a few simple remedies, people can reduce both noise and bias, and so make far better decisions.

 

想像一下,同一個城市的兩位醫生對同一位病人做出不同的診斷--或者同一法庭的兩位法官對犯下同樣罪行的人做出明顯不同的判決。假設同一家公司的不同面試官對難以區分的求職者做出不同的決定--或者當某家公司在處理客戶投訴時,解決方案竟取決於剛好是某人接到那通電話。現在想像一下,同一位醫生、同一位法官、同一位面試官或同一位客服人員會根據早上或是下午,星期一而不是星期三做出不同的決定。這些都是「雜訊」的例子:本來應該是一致的判斷卻產生了變異性。
 
在《雜訊》一書中,丹尼爾•
康納曼,、奧利維•席波尼, 和凱斯•桑思汀展示了「雜訊」在許多領域所產生的不良影響,包括醫學、法律、經濟預測、法醫學、保釋、兒童保護、戰略、績效評估和人事篩選。哪裡有判斷,哪裡就有「雜訊」。然而,大多數時候,個人和組織都沒有意識到這一點。他們忽略了「雜訊」。通過一些簡單的補救措施,人們可以減少「雜訊」和偏見,從而做出更好的決定。

(文字整理/文謙益)

Brand Slider